Categories
Articles

Sometimes you don’t know which mountain you are training for

My dad, a fit, active, and adventuresome man, announced that for his sixtieth birthday he wanted to hike Mt. Kilimanjaro and he wanted his kids to do it with him.  So, the August I was 36 years old, we flew to Tanzania and started our six-day journey to the highest peak on the continent of Africa at 19,341 feet, led by our charismatic guide, Dismas.  Much to our dismay, Dismas insisted that we shuffle up the mountain, frequently shouting to us, “pole, pole,” or Swahili for “slowly, slowly.”  All six of us made it to the summit by simply putting one foot in front of the other, slowly, slowly, and I embraced a life lesson that would prove to be invaluable as I soon faced a challenge that was even harder than summiting Mt. Kilimanjaro.

“Pole, pole,” or Swahili for “slowly, slowly.”

Six months later, I was diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis.  I lost most strength and sensation on my left side, and I went from feeling strong and capable to weak and helpless; I had summited the highest mountain on the continent of Africa and now I couldn’t even get up a single flight of stairs!  It was difficult to reconcile these conflicting self-concepts.  Further, I was frightened about my future.  Would I be able to do the things I loved again? How would this affect my children, who were then eight and ten? Did other people, including my husband, see me differently than before?  This period in my life was fraught with loss.  I literally lost my ability to do things.  I had a hard time cutting my food or opening the tab of a drink can, and I certainly wasn’t able to do the physical activities I loved, like hiking or riding my bike.  But of more significance, I lost my sense of self.  I wasn’t sure who I was anymore.

Chronic illness diminishes self, it disrupts one’s personal narrative, it distorts power, control and intimacy, and it narrows one’s domains.  Together, these impacts lead to an overall loss of self, or a change in who we think we are and how we are experienced by others.  Further, a person who has a firm sense of who they are is more likely to fully experience loss of self.  More specifically, loss related to chronic illness describes “the loss of a person as they once were (Weingarten, 2013, p. 86).”

This explanation of loss related to chronic illness resonates with me because it describes the loss I experienced.  I was diminished because I could no longer do certain things, and I felt less capable and more dependent.  MS disrupted my personal narrative as a strong, physically active person; the stark contrast of having just summited Kilimanjaro definitely made this all the more significant.  My sense of power and control was hugely disrupted; up to that point I believed I could control my life by simply willing it to be a certain way.  Intimacy was a problem for me as I had difficulty talking about my feelings; if I couldn’t be physically strong at least I could appear to be mentally strong, and I wanted to protect my family from more worry about me.  My domains had been narrowed; I wasn’t participating in many of my normal activities, like walking with a group of women, and I didn’t want to go to social events because I didn’t want people feeling sorry for me.  Simply put, I was no longer the person I once was.

Chronic illness can lead to stress and anxiety with long term psychological and physical impact, called post-traumatic stress.

Interestingly, loss, defined as “negative events and their sequalae” is identified as the opposite of growth, or “positive transformation,” and growth is a buffer against post-traumatic stress.  Further, loss and growth can occur simultaneously in the face of chronic illness, though they are independent of one another (Gloub, Gamarel, & Rendina, 2014).

I definitely experienced both loss and growth simultaneously.  I felt great loss surrounding my new physical limitations while at the same time experiencing growth related to my ability to cope and adapt.  I began to value myself as mentally strong versus physically strong.  This helped me regain a sense of power and control and develop a new self-concept, and eventually to see my new self-concept in a positive light.  And, as I felt more positive about myself, despite not being the same person I once was, I began to experience my physical symptoms differently.  This is not unusual; the less self-loss a person experiences, the fewer physical symptoms they report (Gloub et al., 2014). The post-traumatic growth I experienced served as a buffer for me and decreased further loss of self.

I read an opinion piece from NBC news about John McCain’s death that is relevant to thinking about trauma and loss and chronic illness; the author (Baig, 2018) takes issue with people using what he calls martial language to describe how people manage illness.  He says, “McCain did not lose his battle with cancer – because cancer is not war.”  He believes statements like these suggest that death from illness is a personal failure.  I absolutely agree.  In reality, there is little to no correlation between what Baig calls a “fighting spirit” to recovering from cancer and other chronic illnesses; sometimes in life you are just dealt a bad hand.

I remember when I was first diagnosed with MS, people told me I would be all right because I had such a positive attitude.  I would think, “Well, I have always had a positive attitude and it didn’t prevent me from getting MS in the first place.”  Then I would wonder if people would think it was my fault if I didn’t do well, and it made it even more difficult for me to talk honestly about how I was feeling.

As a therapist, I think it especially important to choose language carefully so that in no way do we imply that it is our client’s responsibility to “beat” an illness.

While I understand the value of a good metaphor, this is one I will avoid so to never mistakenly engage in what can feel a lot like victim blaming.

As some of my friends predicted, I have done all right, but not just because I willed it to be so.  Rather, I had lots of social support and access to high quality health care.  I started injecting interferon immediately – a drug that costs my insurance company about $80,000 per year – as well as taking good care of my body.  I began seeing a therapist.  I started physical therapy.  I started going to the climbing gym because it seemed like a good way to regain strength on both sides of my body.  And, I am sure that my positive attitude helped me cope with my disease even if it didn’t cure it.

I wish I could have known then what I know now.  I have regained most of my strength and many days I don’t have any MS symptoms at all, and I live an active and healthy life.  I feel more resilient and competent and well-rounded, and I know I am physically and mentally tough.  I also know how much I drew from my experience hiking Kilimanjaro.

I learned that just like I was able to summit Mt. Kilimanjaro by going slowly, slowly I would also learn to adapt to MS, by simply putting one foot in front of the other.  I had no idea that when I training to climb Mt. Kilimanjaro, I was also training for a different mountain altogether.

 

References

Baig, J.  (29 August 2018).  Opinion:  John McCain did not “lose” his battle with glioblastoma – because cancer is not a war.  NBC News. Retrieved from https://apple.news/AqCpbNypBR7G1Jup9XHbopA

Golub, S. A., Gamarel, K. E., & Rendina, H. J. (2014).  Loss and growth: Identity processes with distinct and complementary impacts on well-being among those living with chronic illness.  Psychology, Health & Medicine.  19 (5) 572-579.

Weingarten, K.  (2013).  The “cruel” radiance of what is”:  Helping couples live with chronic illness.  Family Process. 52 (1) 83-101.

 

 

Categories
Articles

Trauma and Making Meaning

Trauma and making meaning have a very strong correlation.

Trauma disrupts a person’s sense of meaning. There are two types of meaning.  The first is situational meaning, or the meaning a person gives to a specific traumatic event. For example, someone might explain a traumatic event as “an accident.” The second is global meaning, or how a traumatic event fits into a person’s overall view of life. For example, someone might say “I believe everything happens for a reason.” However, after a traumatic event, these two types of meaning may be at odds.  That same person may wonder why an accident happened if they cannot make sense of the reason it happened, especially if they believe the event should have led to greater understanding or an unpredicted better outcome but that is now what they are experiencing. 

After a trauma, there are often discrepancies in one’s belief systems that are resolved either by a person’s ability to incorporate the trauma into their global beliefs or by altering their global beliefs to include the possibility of the trauma (Werdel & Wicks, 2012, p. 62). Therapy helps a person resolve this conflict that a traumatic event might create through in-depth exploration of both their situational meaning and global meaning. 

Contact Christin P Bellian

Categories
Articles

Why is self-esteem so important?

Self-esteem, or self-worth,  is “the ability to value one’s self and to treat one’s self with dignity, love, and reality,” says family theorist Virginia Satir (1988).

Without high self-esteem, people value the thoughts, feelings, and needs of others more than their own, but this denies a person of their own thoughts, feelings, and needs.  People need to know what they think, feel, and need in order to get their yearnings satisfied.

Through therapy, we will explore your thoughts, feelings, and needs, and we will discover your yearnings.

We will work on making the changes in your life that help you satisfy your yearnings. We will find the self-esteem that already resides in you so that you believe you are deserving and worth it. You will treat yourself with dignity, love and reality.

Talk to Christin

Categories
Articles

What is the relationship between self-esteem and communication in families?

Problems occur in families when family members are not able to communicate their true thoughts and feelings or their wants and needs.  Instead, family members communicate what and in ways that do not disrupt the family balance. There is often a strong correlation between self-esteem and communication.

When family members are unable to say what they think, feel or ask for what they want or need, the result is low self-esteem.

Family theorist Virginia Satir (1991) describes the five ways people commonly interact. Placating is characterized by a person putting other people’s needs ahead of their own needs and generally conveying they are not important.  Blaming is when a person refuses to accept influence from anyone else and deflects responsibility for any problems by blaming or criticizing others.  Being super-reasonable is when a person is “inhumanly objective” and responds to an interaction with facts and data while refusing to acknowledge feelings.  Being irrelevant is characterized by distracting from the conflict by bringing in extraneous information to deflect attention from the interaction.

Communicating from these stances results in low self-esteem.

People with high self-esteem communicate from a leveling stance, or they accurately communicate their thoughts, feelings, wants and needs.  When family members see new possibilities for how to communicate, their self-esteem improves.  As your family’s therapist, I will explore with your family how you relate to one another.  I will help you see new possibilities for how to communicate.  Together we will learn, experience, and practice new ways of communicating that accurately convey each family members’ thoughts, feelings, wants, and needs.

Talk to Christin today.